Estimating the Consequences of Sequestration on Agency Performance, Personnel, and the Employees of Federal Contractors
SOURCE: AP/Harry Hamburg
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) talks about debt-ceiling talks with the White House during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington on Friday, July 22, 2011. The Budget Control Act of 2011, which brought last year’s debt-ceiling crisis to an end, contains automatic, across-the-board budget cuts that would go into effect January 2, 2013.
By Scott Lilly | June 18, 2012
Much has been written about the automatic, across-the-board budget cuts contained in the Budget Control Act of 2011, otherwise known as “sequestration,” but many critical questions remain regarding official interpretations of the legislation and how it will actually be implemented on an agency-by-agency basis. These include questions as to exactly which governmental spending accounts are or are not subject to sequestration, how deep the percentage reduction will be in the accounts that are subject to sequestration, how much latitude agencies have in selecting the specific expenditures that will be cut, and what the offsetting expenditures will be in implementing the proposed cuts.
It is nonetheless critical that policymakers begin to understand the possible implications of the legislation particularly with regard to critical governmental services that may impact the broader economy and public safety as well as the degree to which specific sectors of the economy will be impacted and the long-term implications for performing the missions assigned to government agencies in an efficient and cost-effective manner. To do so, however, requires considerable degree of subjective judgment at this point in time. This issue brief examines some of these judgments. Continue reading “How Sequestration Would Work”